Legislature(1999 - 2000)
2000-03-15 House Journal
Full Journal pdf2000-03-15 House Journal Page 2501 HB 312 The following, which had been moved to the bottom of the calendar (page 2496), was read the second time: HOUSE BILL NO. 312 "An Act making and amending appropriations for the operating and loan program expenses of state government, for certain programs, and to capitalize funds; making appropriations under art. 2000-03-15 House Journal Page 2502 HB 312 IX, sec. 17(c), Constitution of the State of Alaska, from the constitutional budget reserve fund; and providing for an effective date." with the: Journal Page FIN RPT CS(FIN) 6DP 2NR 2AM 2447 Representative Foster moved and asked unanimous consent that the following committee substitute be adopted in lieu of the original bill: CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 312(FIN) (same title) There being no objection, it was so ordered. Amendment No. 1 was offered by Representative Mulder: Page 6, line 12: Under Appropriation Items: Delete "125,259,700" Insert "124,933,900" Under General Funds: Delete "107,595,900" Insert "107,270,100" Page 6, line 21: Under Allocations: Delete "3,139,300" Insert "2,813,500" Representative Mulder moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 1 be adopted. There being no objection, it was so ordered. Amendment No. 2 was offered by Representative Brice: 2000-03-15 House Journal Page 2503 HB 312 Page 30, line 27: Under Appropriation Items: Delete "466,495,100" Insert "483,395,100" Under General Funds: Delete "172,143,300" Insert "189,043,300" Page 30, line 28: Under Allocations: Delete "125,000" Insert "170,250,000" Representative Brice moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 2 be adopted. Representative Mulder objected. Representative Ogan moved and asked unanimous consent that he be allowed to abstain from voting due to a conflict of interest. Objection was heard, and Representative Ogan was required to vote. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 2 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 312(FIN) am Second Reading Amendment No. 2 YEAS: 16 NAYS: 20 EXCUSED: 3 ABSENT: 1 Yeas: Berkowitz, Brice, Cissna, Croft, Davies, Grussendorf, Joule, Kapsner, Kemplen, Kerttula, Kohring, Kookesh, Morgan, Murkowski, Smalley, Whitaker Nays: Austerman, Barnes, Bunde, Coghill, Davis, Dyson, Foster, Halcro, Harris, Hudson, James, Kott, Masek, Mulder, Ogan, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Therriault, Williams Excused: Cowdery, Green, Moses 2000-03-15 House Journal Page 2504 HB 312 Absent: Sanders And so, Amendment No. 2 was not adopted. Amendment No. 3 was offered by Representative Croft: Page 8, line 10: Under Appropriation Items: Delete "678,213,600" Insert "697,380,500" Under General Funds: Delete "649,007,000" Insert "668,173,900" Page 8, line 11: Under Allocations: Delete "669,887,400" Insert "689,054,300" Representative Croft moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 3 be adopted. Representative Mulder objected. Representative Croft placed a call of the House. The Speaker stated the call was satisfied. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 3 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 312(FIN) am Second Reading Amendment No. 3 YEAS: 13 NAYS: 24 EXCUSED: 3 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Austerman, Berkowitz, Brice, Cissna, Croft, Davies, Grussendorf, Joule, Kapsner, Kemplen, Kerttula, Kookesh, Smalley 2000-03-15 House Journal Page 2505 HB 312 Nays: Barnes, Bunde, Coghill, Davis, Dyson, Foster, Halcro, Harris, Hudson, James, Kohring, Kott, Masek, Morgan, Mulder, Murkowski, Ogan, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Sanders, Therriault, Whitaker, Williams Excused: Cowdery, Green, Moses Barnes changed from "Yea" to "Nay". And so, Amendment No. 3 was not adopted. Amendment No. 4 was offered by Representative Kemplen: Page 8, line 10: Under Appropriation Items: Delete "678,213,600" Insert "685,765,900" Under General Funds: Delete "649,007,000" Insert "656,559,300" Page 8, line 11: Under Allocations: Delete "669,887,400" Insert "677,439,700" Representative Kemplen moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 4 be adopted. Representative Mulder objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 4 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 312(FIN) am Second Reading Amendment No. 4 YEAS: 11 NAYS: 21 EXCUSED: 3 ABSENT: 5 2000-03-15 House Journal Page 2506 HB 312 Yeas: Berkowitz, Brice, Cissna, Davies, Grussendorf, Joule, Kapsner, Kemplen, Kerttula, Kookesh, Smalley Nays: Austerman, Bunde, Coghill, Davis, Dyson, Foster, Harris, Hudson, James, Kohring, Kott, Masek, Morgan, Mulder, Murkowski, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Therriault, Whitaker, Williams Excused: Cowdery, Green, Moses Absent: Barnes, Croft, Halcro, Ogan, Sanders And so, Amendment No. 4 was not adopted. Amendment No. 5 was offered by Representative Cissna: Page 4, line 24: Under Appropriation Items: Delete "43,493,400" Insert "46,893,400" Under General Funds: Delete "28,493,400" Insert "31,893,400" Page 4, line 25: Under Allocations: Delete "12,855,200" Insert "14,389,200" Page 4, line 26: Under Allocations: Delete "15,638,200" Insert "17,504,200 Representative Cissna moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 5 be adopted. Representative Mulder objected. Representative Ogan placed a call of the House. 2000-03-15 House Journal Page 2507 HB 312 The Speaker stated the call was satisfied. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 5 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 312(FIN) am Second Reading Amendment No. 5 YEAS: 18 NAYS: 19 EXCUSED: 3 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Barnes, Berkowitz, Brice, Cissna, Coghill, Croft, Davies, Grussendorf, Joule, Kapsner, Kemplen, Kerttula, Kohring, Kookesh, Kott, Ogan, Sanders, Smalley Nays: Austerman, Bunde, Davis, Dyson, Foster, Halcro, Harris, Hudson, James, Masek, Morgan, Mulder, Murkowski, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Therriault, Whitaker, Williams Excused: Cowdery, Green, Moses And so, Amendment No. 5 was not adopted. Amendment No. 6 was offered by Representative Kapsner: Page 5, line 15: Under Appropriation Items: Delete "18,151,300" Insert "27,651,300" Under General Funds: Delete "387,900" Insert "9,887,900" Representative Kapsner moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 6 be adopted. Representative Mulder objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 6 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: 2000-03-15 House Journal Page 2508 HB 312 CSHB 312(FIN) am Second Reading Amendment No. 6 YEAS: 16 NAYS: 18 EXCUSED: 3 ABSENT: 3 Yeas: Austerman, Berkowitz, Brice, Cissna, Croft, Davies, Foster, Grussendorf, Joule, Kapsner, Kemplen, Kerttula, Kookesh, Morgan, Smalley, Williams Nays: Barnes, Bunde, Coghill, Davis, Dyson, Halcro, Harris, Hudson, Kott, Masek, Mulder, Murkowski, Ogan, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Therriault, Whitaker Excused: Cowdery, Green, Moses Absent: James, Kohring, Sanders And so, Amendment No. 6 was not adopted. Amendment No. 7 was offered by Representative Cissna: Page 8, line 32: Under Allocations: Delete "26,071,500" Insert "28,771,500" Page 14, line 19: Under Allocations: Delete "29,369,000" Insert "26,669,000" Representative Cissna moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 7 be adopted. Representative Mulder objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 7 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: 2000-03-15 House Journal Page 2509 HB 312 CSHB 312(FIN) am Second Reading Amendment No. 7 YEAS: 11 NAYS: 18 EXCUSED: 3 ABSENT: 8 Yeas: Berkowitz, Brice, Cissna, Croft, Davies, Grussendorf, Joule, Kapsner, Kemplen, Kerttula, Smalley Nays: Austerman, Barnes, Bunde, Coghill, Davis, Foster, Halcro, Harris, Hudson, Kott, Masek, Mulder, Murkowski, Ogan, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Therriault Excused: Cowdery, Green, Moses Absent: Dyson, James, Kohring, Kookesh, Morgan, Sanders, Whitaker, Williams And so, Amendment No. 7 was not adopted. Amendment No. 8 was offered by Representative Berkowitz: Page 4, line 12: Under Appropriation Items: Delete "13,602,200" Insert "14,448,900" Under General Funds: Delete "8,936,300" Insert "9,783,000" Page 4, line 16: Under Allocations: Delete "990,200" Insert "1,836,900" Representative Berkowitz moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 8 be adopted. Representative Mulder objected. 2000-03-15 House Journal Page 2510 HB 312 The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 8 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 312(FIN) am Second Reading Amendment No. 8 YEAS: 15 NAYS: 19 EXCUSED: 3 ABSENT: 3 Yeas: Berkowitz, Brice, Cissna, Croft, Davies, Grussendorf, Halcro, Hudson, Joule, Kapsner, Kemplen, Kerttula, Kookesh, Rokeberg, Smalley Nays: Austerman, Barnes, Bunde, Coghill, Davis, Dyson, Foster, Harris, James, Kott, Masek, Morgan, Mulder, Murkowski, Ogan, Phillips, Porter, Therriault, Williams Excused: Cowdery, Green, Moses Absent: Kohring, Sanders, Whitaker And so, Amendment No. 8 was not adopted.